Showing posts with label crown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crown. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Trespassers...


Stop Trespassing on Native Land

Turn your words of support and "reconciliation" into action!
Every landowner has a right to remove trespassers from their land or property, under their ancient rights of Common Law. This right can be delegated to an agent /representative.
from Black's Law Dictionary

Ever since March 16, 2008, any person who attends a "worship service" in a Catholic, Anglican, or United church in Vancouver is guilty of illegal trespass - as is anyone who even enters the more than 300 buildings attached to these denominations in Vancouver. For all of the land these churches stand on is the common law property of hereditary Squamish Chief Kiapilano, whose family was never consulted when the churches were built, and who has never received a penny in rent from these churches.

So, last March, the Chief told these religious denominations to get off his land especially because of their consistent refusal to say where they buried countless Squamish and other native children who died in "Indian residential schools" run by these same churches.

As one who has been legally delegated by Chief Kiapilano to serve and enforce these eviction notices on the churches named, I am authorized to remind all Canadians that they are committing a common law offense when they attend, use or rent the facilities of the Catholic, Anglican or United churches - and under the law of the land, they can go to jail.

Whose jail? Perhaps not the white man's, but Chief Kiapilano and his people are establishing their own courts of justice, police and detention facilities to deal with those guilty of trespass and the other crimes committed against his people.

Chief Kiapilano and his network plan to start enforcing the eviction notices soon, opening the church buildings in question to the homeless and the poor: the kind of action that got Jesus crucified.

It should be an interesting autumn. So do something more than read this email: Spread the good example of Kiapilano and reclaim the land!

Evict the genocidal churches from your territory - in memory of the 50,000 disappeared residential school children!

Kevin Annett Eagle Strong Voice
www.hiddenfromhistory.org

July 29, 2008



Read and Hear the truth of Genocide in Canada, past and present, at this website: www.hiddenfromhistory.org

“Kevin is more deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize than many who have received it in the past.”
- Dr. Noam Chomsky
Institute Professor Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

“A courageous and inspiring man." (referring to Kevin Annett)
- Mairead Corrigan-Maguire
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
Belfast, Northern Ireland



The very lands we all along enjoyed
they ravished from the people they destroyed ...
All the long pretenses of descent
are shams of right to prop up government.
' Tis all invasion, usurpation all;
' Tis all by fraud and force that we possess,
and length of time can make no crime the less;
Religion's always on the strongest side.

- Daniel Defoe, Jure Divino (England, 1706)

Monday, August 4, 2008

kahentinetha and katenies...

MOHAWK WOMEN FILE ‘DEMAND’. CANADA MUST RESPECT THE “RULE OF LAW”.

MNN. Aug. 4, 2008. The following “Letter of Demand” was sent to the Attorney General of Canada. We are reminding them to fulfill their obligation to us as our historic allies to protect our rights. Canada Border Services Agents has illegally erected facilities in the midst of our community of Akwesasne and is illegally interfering with our right to live peacefully among our people. In particular, criminal assaults have been conducted against members of our community, including the assault against Kahentinetha and Katenies on June 14th 2008 at the “Cornwall Ontario” check point. According to the Canadian Constitution Canada is governed by the rule of law and everyone is equal before the law. This means that Canadian officials must obey the law, just like everyone else. When they commit an assault they should be charged with an assault under the Criminal Code just like anyone else who commits an assault. According to Federal Court of Canada rules, the Attorney General
must answer this letter by August 22, 2008.

LETTER OF DEMAND

Date: July 23, 2008

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

TO: Hon. Robert Douglas Nicholson
Minister of Justice & Attorney General of Canada
284 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
613-941-6900 nicholson.r@parl.gc.ca

TAKE NOTICE THAT ON JUNE 14, 2008, KAHENTINETHA AND KATENIES, MEMBERS OF THE KANION’KE:HAKA/MOHAWK NATION, WERE ASSAULTED, BRUTALIZED, ARRESTED AND DETAINED ILLEGALLY AT THE CORNWALL BORDER.

The following are the facts giving rise to this incident.

1.On June 14, 2008 Sakowaiaks and Kahentinetha went to Akwesasne to pick up Katenies. Kahentinetha is a 68 year old grandmother. Katenies is 43 years old and also a grandmother.

2.At approximately 2:00 pm they were passing through the Canadian border control on the Cornwall portion. Akwesasne is a small community. The Canada-U.S. border has been placed in the middle of the Mohawk community. The people have to cross the border many times a day for groceries or to visit relatives.

3.Katenies, Kahentinetha and Sakowaiaks went through the border and were told to wait under the canopy. They sat there peacefully for an hour surrounded by guards. Some Mohawk elders showed up to witness. Several other vehicles were searched and released. Only Indigenous people were stopped. Eventually a platoon of about a dozen guards marched towards the car, all wearing leather gloves, flack jackets and all kinds of equipment hanging about their waist. One officer, Maurice Saucier [Badge #16121], was on the cell phone throughout directing operations during the attack on Kahentinetha and Katenies.

4.At approximately 3:00 pm Katenies was dragged violently from the back seat of the car by a gang of hefty young men and women. They knocked her down, pinned her to the ground, and forced their knees into her head and back. They handcuffed her and smashed and rubbed her face into the pavement. Sakowaiaks still remembers the sound of flesh hitting the pavement. She received bleeding scrapes and bruises on her face, shoulders, arms and legs. Katenies’ was taken into the customs building and later to Ottawa. She was not given any medical attention. She was not allowed to call her mother and her mother was not permitted to see her or speak to her. Katenies was held incommunicado for three days until she appeared in Cornwall court on June 17, 2008.

5.There were no warrants or charges out for Kahentinetha. Her ID and car keys had already been taken. Katenies’ has not been returned. Also missing are documents that were in the trunk and the shoes taken from Kahentinetha’s feet.

6.It was only after the assault on Katenies began that Kahentinetha was ordered to get out of the car. She saw what they were planning to do to her. Kahentinetha heard Maurice Saucier tell the other agents to “Take her out”. On June 14th 2008 she was afraid for her life if she got out of the car. She was right and continues to be afraid.

7.She was handcuffed, assaulted and imprisoned. Once in the cell, the attack continued. Some of the officers deliberately tightened the handcuffs she was wearing several times. This cut the circulation to her hands. The pain shot up her arms and she experienced flashes of light and pains in the middle of her chest and back. She cried for help. The guards ignored her and tightened the handcuffs more. They yelled threats at her and kept ordering her to bend down. A man stood behind her and had his hands on her pants. She received scrapes and bruises on her arms and legs.

8.Frank Horn, a Cornwall lawyer, and his son Kanatase, happened to be waiting in the line at the border. [613-935-8882]. They wouldn’t let him see his sister, Kahentinetha, until they took off the cuffs and gave her a chair to sit on. When he saw her, he immediately insisted on calling an ambulance. The Akwesasne Police stood and watched in silence. The ambulance took her to Cornwall Community Hospital and the Ottawa Ontario Heart Institute. She remained in hospital for 5 days in the trauma unit and intensive care unit. Since that time she had a relapse and was hospitalized at the Anna Laberge Hospital in Chateauguay Quebec.

9.The medical record confirms that despite excellent physical condition Kahentinetha had a trauma induced heart attack. Her recovery will take a long time. Part of her heart was killed. Her health will never be the same. Both women are now recuperating in the company of their children and grandchildren.

10.None of these women is associated with any kind of criminal activity.

11.The video footage of the assaults on Kahentinetha and Katenies on June 14th 2008 have been confiscated by Canada‘s Department of “National Defense”. We are informed the only way to obtain these videos is to “waive our rights”. .

12.Some of the CBSA officers had the following badge numbers: 17012; 16320; 16511; 16121; and 16275; Some of those involved and responsible for border issues are Alain Jolicoeur, President of CBSA 613-952-3200; Lance Markel, District Director CBSA 613-930-3234; Hon. Stockwell Day, Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness 613-995-1703 day.s@parl.gc.ca; Dave MacKenzie, Parliamentary Secretary, Public Safety, 613-995-4432 mackenzie.d@parl.gc.ca; Akwesasne Mohawk Police 613-575-2250 ext. 2400; and Louis Mitchell, Mohawk Security 613-932-5183, 613-575-2340;

13.We have reason to believe that the Canadian “state” conspired to kill us. These assaults appear to have been carried out by the Canada Border Security Agency, Canada Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, Akwesasne Mohawk Police Services and Mohawk Security Officers, all agencies of the Canadian government. The courts of “Canada” are presently issuing false charges and attempting to serve warrants on Kahentinetha and Katenies.

Demand for Relief:

14. The individuals who assaulted the three women must be charged, tried and punished.
15.Full and complete undoctored copies of the video footage of this event.
16.Full disclosure of all files and official communications concerning the cases of Kahentinetha and Katenies.
17.$10 million for physical, psychological and punitive damages and such other relief as this court may deem fit.

Deadline for settlement:

18.An order that all Canadian government agencies will respect the time delays set out in the rules of court.

From:
Kahentinetha, Bear Clan __________________ kahentinetha2@yahoo.comj
Katenies, Bear Clan ______________________ katenies20@yahoo.com

% Box 991, Kahnawake, Quebec, Canada J0L 1B0, 450-635-9345

Address for service: for the purposes of this proceeding only, service to be made % Julio Peris, 625 Rene-Levesque West, Suite 900, Montreal Quebec H3B 1R2 – 514-933-4656 Fax 514-933-9587.

PLEASE NOTE : As can be seen, it’s becoming critical for legal actions to be taken to protect our rights. We have no funds. Canada is hiring costly law firms to suppress our rights. If you can donate anything to our cause, it will be greatly appreciated. Donate to: PayPal, www.mohawknationnews.com, or “MNN Mohawk Nation News”, Box 991, Kahnawake [Quebec, Canada] J0L 1B0. Nia:en/Thank you very much.

See MNN Category: “Border“ New MNN Books Available Now! The books below, email us: Mohawk Warriors Three - The Trial of Lasagna, Noriega, 20/20$20.00 usd The On-Going Confusion between The Great Law and The Handsome Lake Code$ 20.00 usd The Agonizing Death of "Colonialism" and "Federal Indian Law" in Kaianere'ko:wa/Great Law Territory $20.00 usd Who's Sorry Now? The good, the bad and the unapologetic Mohawks of Kanehsatake $20.00 usd Rebuilding the Iroquois Confederacy Karoniaktajeh $10 usd Warriors Hand Book Karoniaktajeh $10 usd Mail checks and money orders to... MNN P.O. Box 991 Kahnawake, QC J0L 1B0 Purchase t-shirts, mugs and more at our CafePress Store http://www.cafepress.com/mohawknews Subscribe to MNN for breaking news updates http://www.mohawknationnews.com/news/subscription.php Sign Women Title Holders petition! http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Iroquois Link to MNN Get the code and banners to link to Mohawk Nation News. http://www.mohawknationnews.com/pg.php?pag
e=promote.html Your Support - Make a contribution to our newsgroup. Secure your online transaction with PayPal®. http://www.mohawknationnews.com/pg.php?page=donate.html Nia:wen, Kahentinetha Horn Kahentinetha2@yahoo.com Speaking & Contemporary Native Issues Workshops Katenies katenies20@yahoo.com Manager Stay tuned! www.mohawknationnews.com Please forward this email to a friend!

Thursday, July 10, 2008

jurisdiction...


-- "Canada" has no jurisdiction over Mohawk land

On July 14, 2008, Mohawk grandmother and activist Katenies has again been ordered to appear before a judge in the Superior Court of Cornwall, Ontario. Again, Katenies will refuse to recognize the authority of the courts and demand that Canadian officials prove they have jurisdiction over her as an Indigenous woman.

One month ago, on June 14, 2008, Katenies -- accompanied by Kahentinetha of the Kahnawake Mohawk Territory – was targeted for arrest by Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) guards on an outstanding warrant for allegedly "running the border" in 2003, and offenses resulting from her refusal to appear in court and validate the colonial justice system.

Katenies has maintained since 2003 that border officials and the Canadian colonial courts have no jurisdiction over Kanion'ke:haka people or land. In January 2007, Katenies served court officials with a “Motion to Dismiss”, demanding that they establish jurisdiction, if any, over Mohawks and their ability to travel freely between "Canada" and the "United States".

[The Motion to Dismiss is linked here: http://nooneisillegal-montreal.blogspot.com/2007/03/katenies-serves-court-with-jurisdiction.html ] and summarrized as follows.



During the CBSA attack, Katenies and Kahentinetha – who are both writers and contributors to Mohawk Nation News (MNN) – were treated brutally by border guards. Both were handcuffed and tackled to the ground. Katenies was jailed for three days. Kahentinetha suffered a heart attack and is under the care of her family. [ www.mohawknationnews.com ]


[Reports about the CBSA attack, and background information, are linked at:

http://nooneisillegal-montreal.blogspot.com/2008/06/katenies-cbsa-background.html ]

As mainly non-native groups and collectives based in settler communities on or near Mohawk lands, we are publicly standing in support of Katenies, and demand all charges against her by the colonial courts be dropped. We also condemn the brutal attacks by the CBSA on both Katenies and Kahentinetha on June 14, 2008 and declare our solidarity with Indigenous struggles for land, freedom and self-determination.

Endorsed by:
Agitate (Ottawa)
Les Apatrides Anonymes (Montreal)
Block the Empire-Montreal
Kingston Indigenous Solidarity Network
No One Is Illegal-Kingston
No One Is Illegal-Montreal
No One Is Illegal-Ottawa
OPIRG-Carleton
OPIRG/GRIPO-Ottawa
La Otra CampaƱa (Montreal)
People's Global Action Bloc (Ottawa)
Solidarity Across Borders (Montreal)

To endorse this statement, and Katenies, please contact indigenoussolidaritymontreal@gmail.com This legal challenge will cost money. MNN has none. Canada is apparently hiring top law firms to fight the Mohawks. If you could send donations, it would be greatly appreciated to: “MNN Mohawk Nation News”, Box 991, Kahnawake [Quebec, Canada] J0L 1B0. Nia:en/Thank you very much. www.mohawknationnews.com katenies20@yahoo.com






A summary of the documents that Katenies filed are included to provide the legal background on which this case is based.







SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE



PROVINCE OF ONTARIO



CITY OF CORNWALL







Katenies [aka Janet Davis]







v.







HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN





MOTION TO DISMISS







Information #C2202/03, and Court File #06-140






Dated: January 12, 2007



Prepared by: Prepared for:



Aroniakons Katenies a.k.a. Janet Davis

Rotiniaton (turtle clan) Rotiskare:wake (bear clan)

Kahentinetha Rotiskare:wake (bear clan)



Women Title Holders

Kanion’ke:haka of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe

P.O. Box 418, Akwesasne

Via New York) 13655



SEE LIST OF RECIPIENTS AT END OF DOCUMENT.



The question Presented: Provide me in writing the legal basis for your claim to jurisdiction over me and our land.



Attachments: Law, Facts and Analysis served and filed into the record December 18, 2006, Information #C2202/03, and Court File # 06-140, Mohawk Manifesto Books I, II III. Mohawk Manifesto CD format.




MOTION TO DISMISS



(VIOLATION OF ANCIENT BIRTHRIGHT)



SUBJECT OF ANCIENT BIRTHRIGHT








The person of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe who is being charged by the Canada Customs Act with a violation of s.11(1), 153(c) & 153.1, asserts that the corporation of Canada and its agent, Canada Customs, have violated her Ancient Birthright.



The Rotinonhsonni’onwe assert that to deny its people the ability to conduct trade, commerce and travel throughout their territories according to their ancient practices and customs violates the Kaianereh’ko:wa, also known as the Great Law of Peace, as well as the Constitution of the Iroquois. Our agreement is that each party will have jurisdiction over its own people.



The Superior Court of Justice of the province of Ontario in the City of Cornwall is respectfully requested to dismiss all charges and demands for appearance and to return the jurisdiction of this matter to the Mohawk Nation Territory and its Council.






INCIDENT REPORT




On November 13th 2003, I, Katenies, was accused of a non-incident. I was driving through the “Cornwall Island checkpoint” that is placed in the middle of Akwesasne. I was waved through. Supposedly the alarm went off. I was arrested. Customs made a false report forming assumptions that I had “run the border”. I submitted all my paper work challenging the authority of “Her Majesty the Queen”, the corporation of Canada and its agents at the border. The court refused to answer in writing my question in the “Judgment by Retraxit” in the allotted time frame. In March 2004 they lost by default. This made their actions null and void.

According to Section 109 of the Canadian Constitution, Indigenous nations have “prior interests” before that of Canada and its provinces. According to Section 132 of the Constitution the only relationship is nation-to-nation unless there is a surrender. There never was one. I told them they were “squatting” on our land.

On August 16, 2004 I refiled a default to the “Judgment by Retraxit” as the Queen and her courts had not answered me in the 20 days. The court continued to proceed with false actions and proceedings. In February 2004, Federal Magistrate Renaud stated he understood my position on the question about jurisdiction. However, they proceeded to trial anyway. I appeared in early September 2004. He acknowledged then that I did not have to appear. He adjourned to September 22nd 2004. I appeared before that date. I continued to travel freely in my community. Without my knowledge they met and charged me with “not appearing on September 22nd, 2004”. They issued a warrant for my arrest.

I have never accepted their arraignment procedures or any colonial process to impose these “assumed” charges and jurisdiction of the court.

One year later on November 18th 2005 my daughter was accosted by five “Canada Border Service Agents” at the Cornwall Island checkpoint which is an international trading zone. We have an international right to “trade and commerce” which we never gave up. On November 24th 2006, I was on my way to pick up my daughter. A five minute ride takes me through five colonially imposed foreign entities referred to as “United States”, “Canada”, “Ontario”, “Quebec” and “New York State”. on that day I was arrested and taken to Cornwall court to be processed. A court appointed lawyer was sent to represent me. I had not asked for one.

During the bail hearing the court was cleared. Brent Lafave, the Customs investigator, accused me of “being lawless” and demanded that I be detained indefinitely. I explained that Canada follows foreign laws that come from across the water [Britain] and that Onkwehonewe law, the Kaianereh’ko:wa/Great Law, is the law of Turtle Island. I have never given my consent to be other than who I am, an Ongwehonweh. The judge decided I had never been in trouble before. There was no evidence that I would not show up on December 18th 2006. Since they had no jurisdiction and could not “extort” money from me, I was released.

I refused to sign a release form. After threatening to keep me behind bars until a trial and filing new charges to keep obstructing my question, I signed “under protest and duress”. I objected to your illegal detention. I don't understand the nature and cause of your actions applying to me on my land. You must tell me how you got jurisdiction.

December 18th 2006 I showed up and filed a judgment on their actions. When I started reading it into the record, they made noises, tried to get me into their “well”. I felt I was in danger and being set up. By then there were only cops and court personnel in the room. The court was shut down. They ignored me and went on to another matter. We left. They issued a warrant that I left before they could set another date. In January 2007 the CBSA told me that the crown prosecutor had sent me a notice to turn myself in at the border. They mailed me a notice that they had set up a “Court of Estreat” hearing for January 18th 2007 to assess the value of my belongings. I did not attend because the letter informed me that they would keep me in jail until the trial that was set for August 10th 2007. Throughout all this I have represented myself. Then on June 14, 2008 I was arrested on the basis of the September 2004 warrant which had already been dealt with. This warrant was illegally used twice on me.




INDIAN ROOTS OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY



SPECIAL CONSTITUTIONAL BICENTENNIAL EDITION 1988





Published by the North East Indian Quarterly



Edited with Introduction by Jose Barreiro


Based on “Land of the Free, Home of the Brave”







Oren Lyons






The Honorable Oren, speaker for the Onondaga Nation, presented the following statement before the U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs hearing on Senate Resolution (S. Con. 76) to recognize the Iroquois origins of the U.S. Constitution.



I have titled this discussion “The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave”.

Upon the continent of Onowaregeh [Turtle Islans], long before the arrival of the white man, a great league of peace was formed. Dekanawida and Jigosaseh organized a functioning confederation under the Kaianereh’ko:wa, known as Great Law of Peace. The basic principles were peace, equity, justice and the power of the people.

Aionwatha, an Onondaga by birth and a Mohawk by adoption, helped establish a union of peace under the natural laws of the universe. They formulated the good message of how to live in equality where every person had a voice. .

The Dekanawidah, Aionwatha and the people gathered on the shores of the lake now called Onondaga. A Grand Council was formed. It was a government where the people were the power.

The families were formed into clans headed by women. Men and women were equal. The spokesmen were the royaner [roiianer]. The spokeswomen were the Otiyaner [otiianer]. Their voice had to be ratified by full consensus of two-thirds of all of the people. They worked together to establish the inner source of vitality and dynamics necessary for the survival of the community

Two houses were formed in the Grand Council. The “Younger Brothers”, consisting of the Oneida and Cayuga Nations and later the Tuscarora. The other was the Elder Brothers, consisting of the Mohawks and the Oneidas. The Mohawks were the “Keepers of the Eastern Door”, the Onondaga became the “Firekeepers” [chairmen] and the Senecas became the “Keepers of the Western Door”. The rafters of the house were the laws of the Rotino’shonni:onwe, also called the Haudenosaunee, the people of the Long house.

By this process, no leader could be self-proclaimed. Their titles and duties were given by the people. The people could remove him for malfeasance. .

The people have the power to recall royaner, otiyaner or any transgressors of the law based on valid complaints from the people. They were warned three times to change their ways. They shall have a witness at their heaving. The first will be their niece or nephew or someone who could speak for them from their clan. The second shall be the partner of the royaner in council. The third and final warning comes from a man or woman who holds no title. Then shall be exonerated or lose their title or be declared to have carried out a misconduct. The power of recall was vested in the people.

The roiianer and otiianer belong to the people. They must be free from any crime against the people. They cannot have blood on their hands. Their minds must be directed toward the welfare of the people. Their skin must be “seven spans thick” to withstand the accusations, slander and insults as they go about their duties for the people. Their authority is that which the people give him. They cannot demand the people obey their orders. No one could influence their judgment. They carry their title for life or until they are relieved of it by bad conduct or ill health.

At the first council, there were 50 original representatives. Their names became “the Circle of 50 Rotiyaner” to be filled by each succeeding generation. The original government established absolute democracy.

We became a nation of laws. The people joined of their own free will to participate in the decision making of the National Council and the Grand Council.

Self-determination began with the individual. All people were recognized to be free from the youngest to the eldest. It was the nature of free men to defend freedom.

The symbol of the Haudenosaunee became the great white pine with four white roots of truth extending to the four directions. People may follow these roots back to the tree to seek shelter. It was called “the great tree of peace”. An eagle was placed at the top to be ever vigilant against those who would harm the people. The eagle shall scream warnings to the people.

When the roiianer and otiianer were raised and the Great Law was firmly established, the tree was uprooted. The weapons of war were thrown into the chasm to be carried by the undercurrent of water to the furthest depths of the earth. The tree was placed back over this chasm, throwing away forever war between these nations but not against the enemies of the people.

When the white man arrived they found free nations guided by democratic principles, all living according to the natural law, the ultimate spiritual law of the universe. This was the land of the free and the home of the brave.

To Europeans sovereignty relates to the power of kings and queens to rule men as they saw fit and control the lives and property of their subjects. As Felix Cohen put it, “the Indian people had Americanized the white man” who threw off this yoke.

The first treaty between the Indians and the white man took place at Skanect Dah De [Albany, New York] in 1613. It was called the Guswenta or the Two Row Wampum. It established a relationship of separate coexistence on this land between our peoples. The canoe of the Indian and the boat of the white man were to go down the river in peace and friendship forever. The Indian people, our government, our culture, our land and resources in our boat. The white man’s boat carried his religions, government and people.

Brothers and sisters, we now turn our faces towards the future and continue to wish you well in your endeavors as a nation. Perhaps it would be well for you to look back again at our principles of peace, justice and equality, to grasp firmly our hand in recognition of our long association and heed the treaties that we made so long ago that these treaties may continue to thrive for our association as government to government.

With that statement, I close the message from the Haudenosaunee, and I think you very much for your kind attention.




Declaration of Inalienable Powers






We remind the people of the United States and Canada and their agencies that:





Article I: we the Rotinonhsonni’onwe (people of the Longhouse ways forever) who have since time immemorial, been governed by the principles and philosophies instilled within the Kaianereh’ko:wa (Great Law of Peace).



Article II: we the Kanion’ko:haka (people of the flint) also known as the Mohawk are Rotinonhsonni’onwe and are of the Confederacy known also as the Six Nations. We shall continue our ancient traditions of Hunting, Fishing, Trapping and Gathering for personal and economic development which includes transport and trade, which is vital to insure the continued existence of our people and our future generations.



Article III: the agreements that were made between our people and the people of the United States and Canada that we shall continue our traditional way of life and to go undisturbed for all time to come.



Laws of the Kaianereh’ko:wa (Great Law of Peace); also known as the Constitution of the Iroquois.



Wampum 99: The rites and festivals of each nation shall remain undisturbed and continue as before, because they were given by the people of old times as useful and necessary for the good of people.



Wampum 92: “If a nation, part of a nation or more than one nation should endeavor to destroy the great peace by neglect or in violation of its own laws and resolve to dissolve the confederacy such a nation or nations or part of a nation shall be deemed an enemy of the Great Peace.




THE ROTINONHSONNION:WE




THE ROTINONHSONNION:WE: are “The people of the Longhouse ways forever”. We are alternately known as Haudenosaunee, Rotinonhsonni’onwe, the Five Nations, League of Five Nations, Six Nations, the Iroquois and the Iroquois Six Nations Confederacy. Our original territory is protected under the NanFan Treaty of 1701 which covered the land east of the Mississippi to the Arctic.



The Rotinonhsonni’onwe is a confederacy of independent sovereign nations of the Western Hemisphere, on the continent known as Onowaregeh, Turtle Island. We refer to our race as Onkwehonwe, “human beings forever”. We are the Kanienkehaka (Mohawk), Oneniotehaka (Oneida), Onontakehaka (Onondaga), Kweionkohaka (Cayuga), Tsionontowanehaka (Seneca), Tehatiskaroens (Tuscaroroas) Nations. We have many friends and allies of other sovereign nations.




POSITION STATEMENT


“Among the Five Nations and their descendants there shall be the following Clans: Bear, Eel, Snipe, Beaver, Hawk, Turtle, Deer, Heron, Wolf. These Clans distributed through their respective nations shall be the sole owners and holders of the soil of the country and in them is vested, as a birthright”. (Wampum #42, title of clans, Kaianereh’ko:wa “Great Law of Peace”).

The women are the progenitors of the Nation. They pass on the Clan to their children. The lineal descent of the people shall run in the female line. Those women who shall be chosen to sanction the Rotiyaner shall be known as the Otiyaner also referred to as Clan Mothers.

As a member of my respected nation, the Kanion’ke:haka, I, Katenies, also known as Janet Davis, assert my birthright under articles 42, 43, 44, 45 and 46 of the Kaianereh’ko:wa (the great good) also known as the Great Law of Peace or the Constitution of the Iroquois. Any attempt by any foreign or domestic agencies or their departments to deny me my birthright violates the Kaianereh’ko:wa and the Guswentah, also known as the Two Row Wampum Agreement.

A right may exist because of its recognition from time immemorial. A wrong is committed when a right is violated. It may be committed by the denial of a right or by refusal to perform an obligation which is considered a right.

THE CLANS


WAMPUM #42


TITLE OF CLANS: The Clans distributed through their respected nations shall be the sole owners and holders of the soil of the country and in them is vested, as a birthright. Note: There are clans other than these among the 5 Nations. The Europeans, not being members of any of these Clans, have no right to own any land in this part of the world.


WAMPUM #43


MEMBERS OF THE SAME CLAN IN OTHER NATIONS: People of the Five Nations who are members of a certain clan shall recognize every member of the Clan no matter what Nation, as relatives. Men and women, therefore, who are members of the same Clan are forbidden to marry.


WAMPUM #44


LINEAL DESCENT OF THE PEOPLE RUNS IN THE FEMALE LINE: The lineal descent of the people of the Five Nations shall run in the female line. Women shall be considered the progenitors of the nation. They shall own the land and the soil. Men and women shall follow the status of their mothers.


WAMPUM #45


THE CLAN MOTHERS, WOMEN TITLE HOLDERS: The women heirs of the chieftainship titles of the League shall be called Oyaner or Otiyaner for all time to come. Note: The Clan Mothers shall be called Oyaner. Oyaner is derived from the word Oyana meaning “path”. Oyaner is the female “good path maker”. Otiyaner is in the plural. Royaner means “He makes a good path for the people to follow”. Rotiyaner is in the plural.


WAMPUM #46


CLAN MOTHERS ARE KEEPERS OF THE AUTHORIZED NAMES: The women of the 48 (now 50) noble families shall be the heirs of the authorized names for all time to come.

When an infant of the Five Nations is given an Authorized Name at the Midwinter Festival or at the Green Corn and Strawberry and Harvest Festivals, one in the cousinhood of which the infant is a member shall be appointed a speaker. He shall announce to the opposite cousinhood the names of the father and mother of the child together with the clan of the mother. Then the speaker shall announce the child’s name twice. The uncle of the child shall then take the child in his arms and walking up and down the room shall sing, “My head is firm; I am of the League”. As he sings, the opposite cousinhood shall respond by chanting; “Hyen, Hyen, Hyen, Hyen…”, until the song is ended.


Note: The “cousinhood” is the other Clan. The purpose of announcing the Clan of the mother is to point out the Clan of the child. A child is born a Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, etc., but when he is named in the Great Law ceremony, the child becomes an Iroquois or Rotinonhsonni’onwe. He is a Mohawk by blood and can Iroquois by law, for Kaianereh’ko:wa is also known as the Great Law, is the Constitution of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe or the Iroquois Confederacy. By the same token, if an individual or a whole nation leaves the Iroquois Confederacy and in time realizes their great error and decide to be reinstated, they would be required to go through the naming Ceremony or in their case, a re-naming ceremony and hold the Pledge Wampum and re-accept the Great Law and this act could be called the Iroquois Pledge of Allegiance.







ROTINONHSONNI’ONWE PROTOCOL



THE FIRST THREE STRINGS OF WAMPUM


DATE: January 16, 2007 FOR: CANADA PROVINCE OF ONTARIO

Sekon (Greetings)

The oldest protocol of our people is to open every gathering, whether it be spiritual, council, social event or any important proceeding, with an opening called the Ohenten kari’ watehkwen. It means “the words that go before all else”. This ritual is a thanksgiving to all the sustainers of life, to the Powers of Creation, and ends with a request that all the people present become as one peaceful mind. This ritual is in common use today by traditional minded Rotinonhsonni’onwe. Article #7.

Another protocol of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe is The First Three Strings of Wampum from the Condolence or Installation Ceremony. (Kaiahereh’ko:wa: Article #28). This ritual is sometimes referred to as a “Small Condolence”. It is conducted whenever our people meet after a long absence, when we meet new people or at an important event was to take place that required all parties be of a mind that is both clear and at peace.

Are our eyes filled with tears caused by the loss of some of our people since the last time we met? Are our ears packed with dust, impaired our hearing by loss of a loved one? Are we unable to speak freely because there is dust caught in our throats because of the loss of a loved one?

Wampum String #1: If there are tears in our eyes, we now reach to the forests and symbolically retrieve the softest skin of the fawn. We use this soft cloth to cleanse your eyes and wipe away your tears so that you may see, the Rotinonhsonni’onwe, and all of Creation, clearly once again.

Wampum String #2: If your hearing is difficult, we now cleanse from your ears the dust of grief. We now reach for the sky and retrieve a soft feather. We now use this soft feather to clean your ears so that you may hear our voices and sounds of Creation clearly once again.

Wampum String #3: If it is difficult to speak, we now symbolically retrieve water from the purest underground streams deep in our Earth Mother. We give you this pure water. As you drink, the water will cleanse your throat and wash away the feeling of sadness. This will permit you to speak clearly again.

The family Kahwatsire (family) or Clan is the center of our existence. Death was seen a dreadful force. Each log in a fire symbolized a family member. Death was seen as a force that took a log out of the fire (Kahwatsire) so violently that the other logs were greatly disturbed and threw up such a cloud of ashes that the dust settled in the remaining family members’ eyes, ears and throat. This makes it difficult to see, hear and speak after the loss of a loved one.

This symbolism was seen as being so important in our human relationship with each other, that our ancestors adopted this symbolic ritual to be used whenever our people after long absences, new people were greeted, or when proceedings are so important that a clear mind is required.

This ritual indicates a profound understanding of the nature of the human mind, and a desire to restore clarity and a state of peacefulness to it.

KAIANEREH’KO:WA - THE GREAT LAW

THE GREAT LAW: is the philosophy and constitution of the Iroquois based upon peace, natural righteousness and power. This law provides a procedure on how to govern ourselves, how our representatives, both male and female, are selected, their duties and responsibilities and the rights, duties, and responsibilities of the people. It also instructs us on how to resolve disputes internally and externally with foreign nations.

The articles of law have to be know internally by each individual. The Great Law ensures peace to all the people of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe for all time to come. It provides governance that is right and just. It ensures that all the people of the nations have a voice and place in the government. By spreading the message of peace, friendship, unity and justice, it brings lasting peace to all the nations of the earth.


INTERNATIONAL TREATIES


TREATY MAKING POWERS: The Rotinonhsonni’onwe have treaty making powers. The “Guswentha” or ”Tekeni Teiohate” means “Two roads”. The treaty is called “Two Row” or “Two Row Wampum”. It is a relationship created between two sovereigns and is recorded on a belt made of wampum shells.

The first Rotinonhsonni’onwe treaty with a European nation was with the Dutch around 1606. It is a “Peace and Friendship” and a “Trade and Commerce” treaty. It enabled the Dutch to trade freely in and around Rotinonhsonni’onwe Territory without interference or aggression. The Rotinonhsonni’onwe made similar treaties with Great Britain, France, the Thirteen Colonies, and eventually the United States of America. These treaties are referred to as the “Covenant Chain”.

The canoe and sailing vessel travel side by side on the river of life. Each boat symbolically contains their people, language, form of government, laws, culture, traditions and ceremonies. In the indigenous canoe are all the lands and resources that the natural world has vested in the Ongwehonwe. The parties agree to not interfere or make war with the other, forever.

An important feature of the Two Row is the “comity” form of jurisdiction. Each party agreed to turn the alleged guilty party over to their own nation for trial and appropriate punishment.

The Dutch, British and French empires accepted this concept and the United States implemented this principle in the 1794 Canadaigua Treaty, Article VII. It confirms the “Two Row Wampum”, already entered into by U.S. President George Washington.

Another principle of the “Two Row” is that each citizen, of our respective nation, is encouraged to stay completely in our respective “vessel or canoe”. We cannot have “one foot in the canoe and the other in the vessel”. We could find ourselves stranded or perish should a storm suddenly arise and the vessels separate away from each other.

We can only follow one jurisdiction, one law. Forcing our people into Canadian or Ontario jurisdiction can subject our nations to great peril.

The Great Law embodies the principles of the Two Row Wampum in the following articles:

Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #78: whenever a foreign nation enters the League or accepts the Great peace, the Rotinonhsonni’onwe and the foreign nation shall enter into an agreement and compact by which the foreign nation shall endeavor to persuade other nations to accept the Great Peace.

Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #83: When peace shall have been established by the termination of the war against a foreign nation, the shall the Great Peace come.

Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #84: Whenever a foreign nation has been conquered or by their own will accepted the Great Peace, their own system of internal government may continue, but they must cease all warfare against other nations. Note: Since the foreign nation’s internal government is kept intact, this implies that all other aspects of that nation’s society remain as before such as: territory, language, laws, jurisdiction, culture, traditions and spiritual (or religious) ceremonies. A further protection of spiritual ceremonies is found in the Great Law. Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #87: When the war of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe on a foreign nation is ended, peace shall be restored to that nation. When all the terms of peace have been agreed upon, a state of friendship shall have been established. Note: After the war, the former enemies shall become friends.

Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #97: Before the Onkwehonwe united their nations, each nation had its own Council Fire. Before the Great peace, their councils were held. The Council Fires shall continue to burn as before and they are not quenched.

Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #99: The rites and festivals of each nation shall remain undisturbed and continue as before, because they ere given by the people of old times as useful and necessary for the good of men.

LAND

Historically, the Rotinonhsonni’onwe extended its power from the east of the Mississippi, to the Arctic, to the Atlantic seaboard and to Florida. Rotinonhsonni’onwe are independent of, and not subject to, other nations and their laws. The Rotinonhsonni’onwe cannot give up or sell our land.

Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #56: Five strings of shells tied together shall represent the Five Nations. Each string shall represent one territory and the whole a completely united territory known as the Five Nations (Rotinonhsonni’onwe ) Territory.

Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #57: Five arrows shall be bound together very strong and shall represent one Nations each. As the five arrows are strongly bound, this shall symbolize the complete union of the nations. thus are the Five Nations (Rotinonhsonni’onwe) completely united and enfolded together, united into one head, one body and one mind. They, therefore, shall labor, legislate and council together for the interest of future generations.

Kaianereh’ko:wa – Article #72: The soil of the earth from one end to the other is the property of the original people who still inhabit it. By birthright, Onkwehonwe (human beings forever) are the owners of the soil, which they own and occupy and no other may hold it. The same law has been held from the oldest times.


PEOPLE’S REPRESENTATIVES


PEOPLE’S REPRESENTATIVES: We, the people of each Nation, have the constitutional authority to select our national male representatives. Our national female representatives and women nominate the men, approve them or nominate their own candidates. They must be legally installed.

ROIANER is our National and Rotinonhsonni’onwe male representatives. Roianer means ‘he who is given the path to follow” which is set by the Great Law. They do not “lead” the people according to their own will but only according to the Great Law.

OIANER: is the female representative. It means, “she has been given the path to follows”. They are also referred to as Clan Mothers and hold the Rotiianer titles.

AHSAREKOWA: is the mediator between the people both during times of peace and during times of stress.






RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE



WAMPUM #93



Referendum



The people decide on the most important matters


Whenever an especially important matter or a great emergency faces the League Council and the matter effects the entire Five Nations then the rotiianer of the League must submit the matter to the people. This decision shall be a confirmation of the voice of the people. Note: When the referendum (decision by the people) was first practiced.


WAMPUM #94


THE MEN OF EVERY CLAN SHALL HOLD A COUNCIL OF THE CLAN AND THEIR DECISION SHALL BE CONSDERED BY THE COUNCIL OF CHIEFS

The men of every Clan of the Five Nations shall have a Council Fire ever burning in readiness for a Council of the clan. They may hold a council to discuss the welfare of the Clan. This Council shall have the same rights as the Council of Women


WAMPUM #95



THE COUNCIL FIRES OF THE WOMEN OF EVERY CLAN HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS THE COUNCIL OF THE MEN


The women of every Clan of the Five Nations shall have a Council Fire ever burning in readiness for a council of the Clan. They shall hold a council, and their decision and recommendation shall be introduced before the Council of Rotiianer by the Rotiskenrakete.

THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE OF THE NATION OR CONFEDERACY OF NATIONS

KAIANEREH’KO:WA – Article #96: All the Clan Council Fires of a Nation or of the Confederacy of Nations may unite into one general Council Fire to discuss the interests of the people. The people can make appointments and delegate their power to others of their number. When their council shall have come to a conclusion on any matter, their decision shall be reported to the council of the nation or the League Council (as the case may require) by the head Warrior or head Rotiskenrakere.

Note: The League Council is also known as the Grand Council. When the people hold a general council, the Grand Council has to go along with the decision as the Confederacy is a people’s government.


WAMPUM STRINGS


Article #23: Any of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe may use shells or wampum as the record of a pledge, contract or agreement entered into. The same shall be binding as soon as shell strings have been exchanged by both parties. The people of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe have both an inherent right and a constitutional right to assemble at any time or place within our territory, without seeking permission from any nation, Councilor or authority other than the Great Law itself.

THE NATIONAL COUNCIL IS THE PROPER PLACE TO ADJUDICATE THIS ISSUE. THEREFORE THIS COURT IS RESPECTFULLY REQUEST TO DISMISS ALL CHARGES AND RETURN THIS ALLEGATION TO THE KANION’KE:HAKA COUNCIL FIRE. AS WELL A REVIEW OF THIS CASE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE GRAND COUNCIL IN ORDER THAT ALL NATIONS MAY BE ABLE TO OBSERVE ITS FINDINGS.

SUBMITTED TO: THE ONTARIO COURT, PROVINCIAL DIVISION, 29 SECOND ST. WEST, CORNWALL ONTARIO CANADA ON Kanion’ke:haka Land.



I asked you a reasonable question and have a right to an answer. Show me in writing how did your court get jurisdiction over me and my land. I am not a citizen of Canada. Our relationship is governed by international law. You must deal with me through your head of state, not through your court or law enforcement agents.



Because you have placed yourselves illegally in the midst of my community, you are interfering with my right to freely traverse my territory.



You have set a date for me to appear in your court on December 18th 2006 and a trial for August 10, 2007 in Alexandria “to deal with the outstanding charges”. Before any of this can be undertaken, you must prove your jurisdiction over me and my land. This imaginary line does not pertain to me. You have no right to charge me before your court.



On December 18th 2006 I spoke for myself before your court in full view of thirteen people.



The Jay Treaty of 1794 is between two colonial entities, the U.S. and Great Britain. This line was meant for your subjects only. As the Jay Treaty is a third party agreement, it is not binding on Onkwehonwe. You cannot interfere with our birthright to conduct trade, commerce and travel anywhere in the Western Hemisphere.



We can only meet with your head of your state to clear up this misunderstanding.



Attached is the Information I filed on this case on December 18th 2006. It contains the Facts, the Law and the Analysis of this case. Also attached and filed into No. C2202/03 and Court no. 06-140, formal recorded evidence of U.S.S.C. 05-165 and File #A-363-05 Federal Court of Appeal of Canada contained in the Mohawk Manifesto, bound and labeled Book I, II, III, and in CD word document format.






CONCLUSION


THE ROTINONHSONNI’ONWE ARE SOVEREIGN ONKWEHONWE NATIONS OF ONOWAREGEH, ALSO REFERRED TO AS THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE. WE ARE CREATED AS FREE AND INDEPENDENT PEOPLE WHO ARE PART OF THE NATURAL WORLD. WE DEVISED A LAW AND A WAY OF LIFE THAT IS NATURAL AND ADDRSSES THE TRUE NATURE OF HUMAN BEINGS.

WHEN HUMAN BEINGS FROM FAR AWAY CAME AMONG US, WE ENTERED INTO TREATIES OF PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP WITH THEM. WE AGREED TO RESPECT EACH OTHER AS BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND NOT TO INTERFERE WITH ONE ANOTHER.

WE HAVE ADHERED TO THESE PRINCIPLES . IF YOU SAY THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS MADE OTHER ARRANGEMENTS AND HAS GIVEN HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AND THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO JURISDICTION IN THESE MATTERS, THEN THAT IS A VIOLATION OF A SOLEMN TREATY ENTERED INTO BETWEEN OUR NATIONS AND IN TURN VIOLATES INTERNATIONAL LAW. THIS MATTER IS CLEARLY A POLITICAL MATTER. FOR ALL THE REASONS STATED ABOVE THE ALLEGED CHARGES SHOULD BE DISMISSED.



Signed on this ____ day of January 2007 on Kanion’ke:haka territory,



Katenies [aka Janet Davis] _______________

Woman title Holder of the Kanion’ke:haka of the Rotinonhsonni’onwe – according to Wampum 44 of our law, the Kaiahereh’ko:wa, the Women are the “progenitors of the soil” of Turtle Island. The women are the caretakers of the land, water and air of Turtle Island. As the trustees, the Women are obligated to preserve and protect the land’s integrity for the future generations.





LIST OF RECIPIENTS OF "MOTION TO DISMISS"

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II

Buckingham Palace, London, SQ1A UK



Justice of the Peace Stewart

Superior Court of Justice

29 Second St. West, Cornwall, Ontario



Ronald J-L Turgeon

Crown Attorney

404 -132 Second St. East,

Cornwall Ontario K6H 1Y4



Brent Lafave, CBSA, Investigator

90 Akwesasne International Road

Akwesasne, Ontario K6H 5R7



Murray McDonald

Crown Attorney

404-132 Second St. East

Cornwall, Ontario K6H 1Y4



T. Donihee

Counsel for the Federal Crown

404 -132 Second St. East,

Cornwall Ontario K6H 1Y4



Lance Markell, District Director,

Northern Office – Customs, St. Laurent Blvd.,

Ottawa Ont. K1G 4K3



Jennifer Burke and Guy Simard /A

Office of the Crown Attorney

United Counties of Stormont,

Dundas & Glengarry

29 Second Street West

Cornwall, ON K6J 1G3



The Governor General of Canada

M. Michaelle Jean

1 Rideau Drive, Ottawa



Prime Minister Stephen Harper

House of Commons

Ottawa



Hon. Stockwell Day

Minister of Public Safety

House of Commons, Ottawa



Alain Jolicoeur

President, CBSA

Ottawa, ON K1A 0L8



Hon. Irwin Cotler

Justice Canada

284 Wellington St., SAT-6053

Ottawa, ON K1A 0H8



Daniel A. Bellemare

Justice Canada

284 Wellington St., SAT-6053

Ottawa, ON K1A 0H8



Hon. Robert Douglas Nicholson

Minister of Justice and

Attorney General of Canada

284 Wellington St.

Ottawa, ON K1A 0H8



Hon. Michael J. Bryant

Attorney General of Ontario

720 Bay St., 4th Floor

Toronto, ON M5G 2K1



Hon. Yvon Marcoux

Minister of Justice and A.G.O.

Louis-Phillipe-Pigeon Bldg.

1200 Rue d l'Eglise, 9th Floor

St. Foy G1V 4M1



Hon. Jim Prentice

Minister of Indian Affairs

10 Wellington St.

Hull, Que. K1A 0H4



Premier Dalton McGuinty

Province of Ontario

Queens Park, Toronto ON



Premier Charest

Province of Quebec, Legislature

Quebec City



British High Commission

80 Elgin St.

Ottawa, ON K1P 5K7



Canadian Human Rights Commission

344 Slater St., 8th Floor

Ottawa, ON K1A 1E1



United Nations

405 E 42nd Street

New York, NY 10017



Women Title Holders of the Kanion'ke:haka

c/o Box 991

Kahnawake of Mohawk Territory

J0L 1B0



Confederacy Rotiianer Alan McNaughton, Arnie General, Six Nations Secretariat Leroy Hill

RR #6

Hagersville, N0A 1H0



The Hague, Anna Paulownastraat

103, 251 BBC

The Netherlands



Coalition for the International Criminal Court

c/o WFM, 708 3rd Ave., 24th Floor

New York, NY 10017

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Robert Lovelace from prison...

A CASE AGAINST COLONIALISM

BY ROBERT LOVELACE

Letter to the Legislators of Ontario

May 11, 2008

I am writing this letter to you from the Central East Correctional Centre in Lindsay, Ontario. I have been imprisoned here during the last three months for contempt of court because I said I cannot obey an injunction which conflicts with my duty under Algonquin law to protect our land.

I am writing because I believe you are honest men and women who work in the best interests of your constituents and for the betterment of Ontario. Is it to your intelligence and compassion that this letter is addressed. What I write may shock and anger you. It will certainly cause embarrassment. My hope is that what you read here will engender in you the same commitment to justice that I have felt within these prison walls and throughout my life.

On February 15th of this year, I was sentenced to six months in prison and fined $25,000. Co-Chief Paula Sherman was also fined $15,000. She is a single mother and a grandmother and the sole supporter for three dependents. She cannot and will not pay the fine and will have to report to jail on May 15 to serve a 90 day prison sentence. Our offence was declaring our intention to peacefully protect our homeland after 30,000 acres had been staked for uranium exploration. The staking had been done without our knowledge or consent and the claims were registered by Ontario's Ministry of Mines without notification. Extensive deep core drilling was planned for last summer without consultation or accommodation.

In June of last year, the Council of the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation requested the exploration company remove their personnel and equipment. When they complied, we secured the area with the help of our non-Algonquin neighbours. In July, the company, Frontenac Ventures Corporation, sued us for $77 million, and in August obtained an injunction ordering unfettered access to our lands. Since their still had not been any consultation, as required by Supreme Court decisions, we refused to remove the security barrier, and found ourselves convicted of "contempt" by your court.

Although the context behind my imprisonment is useful, this letter is not about mining or the out-dated Ontario Mining Act. There is already much public discussion now going on about toxic mining and the need to protect citizens' rights. This letter as well is not about Aboriginal rights or the protection of our homeland, although our Indigenous rights and responsibilities contribute to the discourse. This letter is a case against colonialism, the dysfunctional heritage that we share; the colonialism that informs every aspect of our current relationship and will undo our security and undermine the future for all citizens in this province. Democracy and colonialism can not walk hand-in-hand for long before the disparity in justice, economic opportunities and morality so sickens human spirits that we will all live without hope of becoming the nations we wish to be.

For many years in my intellectual life I tried to understand why, as Indigenous people, we were destined to suffer under the oppression of colonialism. I wanted to know if some natural law at the beginning of time had proclaimed it so, or if it were an accident of conditioning, or if it were essential to social order that made such suffering a necessity. I believed that if I could only know how it had come to be then I would be satisfied with the justification, or understand how you fix the mechanics.

As the years have carved away my curiosity, I have at last concluded that it does not matter how colonialism came to be or who is at fault. I do not care if I ever know how colonialism took root in this world. Now, I just want to be free of it. I want to know that succeeding generations of First Nations children will not be looked upon as inferior, that their birthright and home will not be stolen, that they will have the advantage of dreaming their own dreams and following their own visions. And as much as I want my own children to be free, I want your children not to suffer the moral uncertainty that comes with living well because others are oppressed.

You are legislators. You have the responsibility for writing the laws and policies that frame colonialism and give it social and political structure in Ontario. Unwriting colonialism is not a political process. One party or coalition can not do it alone. Ending legal colonialism is not for partisans. It requires a consensus among law makers who regard justice and humanity above competition for popularity. Those of you who will work for just change will believe in the rightness of your laws as strongly as I believe in the rightness of Algonquin law. When you decide to erase colonialism from your laws you will be risking your future as much as I have risked mine. They are your laws that embody colonial oppression of Aboriginal people and although we can offer guidance, it will be you as legislators who will choose to be, or choose not to be, the burden of innocent generations of come.

The present and accepted course of de-colonization has failed. It has failed both in letter and in spirit. We are living an illusion that Canada and the Provinces no longer oppress First Nations. Nothing in this lie could be further from the truth. If it was so, when did this reversal take place? Was it with Confederation? No - Confederation marked the transition from an ambivalent British Crown to a purposeful extermination of everything Indian. Was it during the Canadian centre of repressive laws that alienated Aboriginal people from their lands and customs? No. Did revisions of the federal Indian Act reverse the national strategy of "taking the Indian out of the Indian child" or save thousands of Indian children from the "sixties scoop"? No.

Have decisions of the Supreme Course recognized original jurisdiction or simply redefined domination in more tolerable terms? Did the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People and hundreds of other studies inform the Nation and change public attitudes? No. Did patriating the Constitution in 1982 succeed in defining the rights and jurisdiction of Aboriginal Nations as it did for the Federal and Provincial governments? No! Please, honestly, ask yourselves, when such a historical turn around occurred and when substantial changes in legislation were written which would have allowed the transition to take place.

Freedom does not come in increments. Colonialism will not give way through wishful thinking or half-measures. In the past, politicians, clergy and intellectuals argued that Aboriginal people were not ready for "civilization" and needed the guiding hand of the colonizer. This ideology is nothing more than self-serving paternalism. Freedom is not something that Aboriginal people should have to earn. If freedom were to be bought, then we have paid for it a thousand fold. Freedom comes when the gate is opened wide or broken down. If there is anyone who has not been ready for Aboriginal people to take their rightful place in Canada, it is you, the colonizer. Until you actively and explicitly make colonialism illegal then it will always be you who are not ready.

The forces that guard colonialism are large. The federal and provincial governments employ hundreds of lawyers, bureaucrats and academics to discredit Aboriginal claims and put Aboriginal people in their place. They work on land claims, court cases and public policy in an effort to limit the Crown's obligations and liability to Aboriginal people. When have Ontario lawyers defended an Aboriginal right or vigorously advanced Aboriginal claims? They just don't do that.

Colonialism will remain firmly entrenched as long as we work in an adversarial system in which communities that have been undermined socially, economically and politically for over two centuries must play by their opponents' rules on a field with a precipitous incline. I have watched as a generation of great minds have been squandered on both sides of this rivalry because intransigent bureaucrats and partisan politicians have been afraid to let "the thin edge of the wedge" change public policy and institutionalize just treatment of Aboriginal citizens. It is not for want of informed and competent negotiators that Canada and Ontario have a slew of unsettled claims and associated conflicts; rather it is the law makers' lack of political will, fairness and honesty in putting an end to the immoral advantage of colonialism.
Let me give you a clear and recent example of how Aboriginal people experience negotiations. In October of last year, Judge Cunningham of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, who presides in the suit brought by Frontenac Ventures against my community, suspended the hearing for twelve weeks in an effort to get all the parties talking. Ontario, Frontenac Ventures and the two First Nations agreed to a prioritized list of issues and to jointly choose a mediator. At that point, we removed our security barrier and permitted Frontenac Ventures to carry out unobtrusive survey work.
When the discussions began, the corporation did not attend or send a representative. Instead they installed security guards at the site.
Ontario's representatives consistently refused to discuss the issues outlined in the predetermined agenda which included as the first item, Ontario's legal responsibility to consult with First Nations communities before development of a resource begins. Ontario negotiators rejected out of hand three comprehensive settlement proposals put forward by Ardoch. Ontario negotiators demanded that we inventory our "values" for the staked land, but refused to accept the description of these "values" when expressed in cultural context or with their meanings in Anishnabemowin, our language.
When it was apparent that time was running out in the 12 week process, the lead Ontario negotiator, who had been a former Deputy Minister of Northern Development and Mines, conceded that Ontario's duty to consult should be met. He agreed with Ardoch that a broad range of possible outcomes should be considered. He also agreed that the consultation process could conclude with an end to uranium exploration. Ardoch had favoured such an open consultation from the beginning of negotiations. Having arrived at an agreement that a plan of "appropriate consultation" would be submitted to Judge Cunningham we proceeded to discuss the framework for the consultation process.
A week later, after substantial collaboration on the framework, Ontario's lead negotiator advised us that there had never been an intention to halt exploration and that exploratory drilling would be taking place during the proposed consultation process. We could either agree or face the court and charges of contempt.
This experience seems to be universal across the country. It has not changed much since the starvation tactics used by Sir John A. Macdonald in negotiating the early numbered treaties. While Aboriginal people cling to the hope that the Crown administrators will be merciful and accept some limited fashion of constitutionally protected rights, bureaucrats and their Ministerial masters do everything in their power to extinguish those rights and uphold the colonial state.
Legislators and governments are not solely responsible for maintaining the immoral practice of colonialism. Even the Supreme Court of Canada, often praised for its progressive decisions on Aboriginal rights, is a principle defender of the sovereign privilege of domination. Supreme Court decisions, while recognizing the historical and legal validity of Aboriginal rights, limit the scope and practice of those rights in favour of "larger" Canadian interests. An analogy of the dilemma is listening to the stories of an abused child in an Indian residential school, patting her on the head and then telling her not to disobey the priest. Such is the sanctimonious hypocrisy of your highest court. These same courts permit Canada's governments to ponder for years on the policy implications reflecting these half-hearted concessions, rendering the entire legal process of protecting Aboriginal rights an exercise in "too little, too late".
Ontario has been consistently guilty of regarding Aboriginal rights as an inconvenient demand on the moral character of a tolerant society. But Aboriginal rights are your laws, not ours. They originate in English law as the doctrine of "continuity" and find substance in such documents as the Royal Proclamation of 1763. Section 35 rights in the Canadian Constitution are an attempt to address the fundamental denial of the existing laws of Aboriginal Nations and to bring into sovereign Canada a sense of Aboriginal belonging. But we have had our own laws and governance and the Crown, through the doctrine of "continuity" has never had the right to overrule them.
Our laws do not involve a concept of "rights". In our cultures, mutual respect and benefit are understood as imperatives for survival. Aboriginal cultures regard law as a complex set of responsibilities to the land and in human relations. The emphasis is on protecting sustainability and avoiding conflict. When Europeans first came to settle in the Ottawa valley in 1800, this is what our ancestors asked of them: to share the land and get along. Through 150 years of French and 100 years of English contact, the doctrine of "continuity" was practiced. We must be clear that recent constitutional commitments in section 35 to "recognize and affirm" Aboriginal and treaty rights are Canadian law. Our leaders at the time asked for much more.
The disparity between your laws and ours' represents the gap between lip service and Aboriginal peoples' ambition to restore our homelands and cultures. Without a sense of moral clarity and comprehensive entitlements, section 35 of your Constitution is almost meaningless. It gives you as legislators no standard or instruction upon which to write anti-colonial legislation. As such, it gives Canadian courts nothing with which to reconcile the past and even less with which to arbitrate the future. Courts will continue to define Aboriginal rights as subservient and Aboriginal title as third class.
As a colonized people we must accept a share of the responsibility for our condition. Like you, we have internalized colonialism. We have allowed it to inform the way we see the world and ourselves. Too often we have turned to the colonizing governments for support. Too often we expect you to solve out problems or blame you for our inadequacies. Too often we are satisfied with handouts rather than partnerships or ownership. We have come to accept colonial labels such as "status" and "non-status" as definitions of who we are. We let these labels divide our families and communities.
Our leaders have accepted foreign forms of governance which undermine our unity and foster corruption. We have come to accept that blood quantum, shades of skin colour and even levels of education determine our Indianess. Far too often we have given up, given in to self-hate, self-abuse and the abuse of others. Like you, we have to confront colonialism on our own terms, for it is just as immoral to accept victimization as it is to benefit from oppression.
Ontario's education system is a primary instrument in ensuring that colonialism remains unchallenged. Many Ontarians know nothing of how generations of Aboriginal children were victimized by church and state. Ontarians posses only a vague understanding of how land was overrun by settlement in the 19th century and Aboriginal people were forced to sign unconscionable treaties and land sales in return for modest protection. As far as understanding the evolution of colonial laws, almost all citizens are ignorant.
Even the real suffering of their own immigrant ancestors as slaves, indentured servants, child labour and cannon fodder have been sanitized for the popular glorification of Ontario's history. Many of these immigrants were escaping colonialism in their own homelands, just as refugees today come to Canada to find a better life. But they acquire no real history about themselves and at best only an "honourable mention" of Aboriginal realities. Without an honest and fully informed education system, your job of challenging and changing colonial laws is as difficult as our in changing the attitudes of ignorant neighbours.
Almost all of you have either publicly or privately condemned the Aboriginal people who protest and obstruct economic and civic activity. At best you have expressed complacent tolerance and an admission that Aboriginal dissatisfaction may have some merit. Ontario's civility rests on its affluence, not on its moral intelligence or character. It is this artificial civility that Aboriginal protestors challenge. Each time a road is blocked, exploration for minerals is halted, or forestry is interrupted, Aboriginal activists are raising the prickly question of Ontario's morality.
Each time a protest forces a political "spin" to be re-spun, law makers are confronted with the ineptitude of their own professional history. You may not like the politics of confrontation but I would rather see Shawn Brant block the 401 than Ovide Mercredi begging at the gates of Meech Lake, or Phil Fontaine writing Steven Harper's apology for the abuse of residential schools.
The affluence of Ontario has been acquired from the sacrifice of our ancestors' health and the wealth of our homelands. If immobilizing the power of that affluence is the only way to expose the evil of colonization then you need to brace yourselves. Aboriginal people and our thoughtful neighbours are sick and tired of colonialism. People of all races who hunger for justice, who understand the sacredness of creation and the folly of greed will find expression in tearing down colonialism. Aboriginal protests are not so much about past grievances. They are about the effects of present dispossession. Aboriginal activism is about changing the course of the future.
During the last week of May, Aboriginal people across Canada will be preparing for the National Day of Action on May 29th. Many people will come to Queen's Park. They are coming to talk to you. Throughout that week you will have the opportunity to listen to Aboriginal people and their friends express their fears and aspirations for the future. You will also hear their complaints. If you are wise you will listen. If you are as courageous as they are, you will allow what you hear to inspire your actions. If you are thankful for the Creator's gift of life, you will extend your hands in peace and friendship. It is up to you if you choose a partnership with Aboriginal Nations to begin the arduous task of rewriting Ontario's laws to exclude colonial principles. But if you choose to do nothing, or to condemn us, then please do not make excuses or false promises.
In the days leading up to May 29th, the media will extol the Canadian virtue of tolerance. In the days following, the media will sensationalize the "criminality" of Aboriginal defiance. You will see large pictures of masked warriors but little honest context. As you look with trepidation into the masked faces remember that those of us who wear no masks have been faceless as well, all of our lives. The real news will be in the conversations that you will have in the midst of demonstrations and at the edge of the barricades.
As much as I would like to be with you and my brothers and sisters at Queen's Park at the end of May, I will be here in prison. Throughout my life, I have advocated the path of non-violence as the only means of restoring our cultural integrity and our belonging within creation.
Freedom, at last, is a state of spirit. Even within the walls of this cell, my spirit can heal and grow and under the burden of oppression, all of our spirits can rise up. My spirit, like a seed, can wait throughout the long winter and come to life again when there is room to grow. Non-violence does not mean timidity. Those of us who have chosen a life of non-violence vigorously fight against the oppression and injustice that is sustained by violence. Colonialism, the laws that uphold it, the police actions that take down barricades and disrupt peaceful protests, are violence. Freedom flows around violence like water in a stream flows around a fallen log. Freedom is beautiful like the colours of the earth. Violence is ugly. My spirit will be with all of you at the end of May in peace and friendship.
My immediate thoughts are with my community and the threat of extensive deep core drilling. There is also the humiliation that Ontario is unwilling to allow our community into the decision-making process before further encroachment occurs. And there is the constant anxiety of what an open pit uranium mine will do to our land, our health and the health of our neighbours down stream. My heart aches in the memories of fishing along that river; the blueberry picking on the ridges and the winter solitudes of Arty's trapline. For two hundred years, colonists have been taking out land. I wonder every day when it will stop.
Because I do not have that answer I will begin a fast on May 16 and I will fast until I have an answer. I will not be fasting as a political statement or to extricate some concession from Ontario. In our culture we fast to purify our bodies and free our spirits. We fast in anticipation of a vision of things to come and to prepare ourselves to accept a great challenge. If my fast over the next few weeks brings attention to the defense of our community I will welcome the growing interest. I will also be praying hard for the protection of Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug and all of the communities struggling to survive. If in some small way my fast contributes to the non-violent struggle against Canadian colonialism, then all the better. I have no expectation of the Premier or his Ministers. The gun is to our head not his. I will pray that their hearts and minds become clear and that we will meet soon to work together to find solutions to the mess we are in.
When I began this letter I wrote that you might be shocked, angered and certainly embarrassed. If reading my thoughts made you uncomfortable, I am not sorry. It was my intent to shake you out of your complacency and indifference. Aboriginal people do not want your platitudes. We want change. We want an end to colonialism. We want legislation that protects our rights and recognizes our original jurisdiction. What you did yesterday in the name of justice for Aboriginal people is not enough. No matter what happens now, we will walk tomorrow's road together; you must ask yourself how you have that journey to be.
In the spirit of Peace and Friendship, mutual respect and benefit, I wish you to be well in your work, your play and your dreams.
Migwetch,
Robert Lovelace
Retired Chief
Ardoch Algonquin First Nation
---------
URANIUM NEWS SPECIAL May 21st: Toronto Rally

Uranium News

Rev. Annett on the truth....

Author's Note:

This article below was offered to the Canadian media as an exclusive piece last week, and was rejected or ignored by the following newspapers:

The Globe and Mail, The National Post, The Montreal Gazette, The Toronto Star, The Ottawa Citizen, The Ottawa Sun, The Winnipeg Free Press, The Edmonton Sun, The Vancouver Sun, The Province, The Alberni Valley Times, The Epoch Times, and the Victoria Times Colonist:

Why an Apology is Wrong, and Deceptive: Bringing Humanity to Bear on the Residential School Atrocity
by Rev. Kevin Annett

Rend your hearts, and not your garments
Joel 2:17

Imagine for a moment that your own child goes missing and never comes home. Years pass, and one day, the person responsible for your child's death is identified, but he evades arrest and imprisonment simply by issuing to you an "apology" for your loss. He even speaks of seeking "reconciliation" with you.

How would you feel?

Hold on to that feeling, and now multiply your loss by many thousands of children, and make the guilty person the government and churches of Canada. Do so, and you will have arrived in a human way at the Indian Residential Schools atrocity.

One of my former parishioners put it another way:

"What we did to those native children was an abomination, and abominations aren't resolved with words and money. We need to have our hearts torn in two and be changed. We've got to stand, ourselves, under the judgment of God."

I doubt that Prime Minister Stephen Harper would be satisfied with an apology if his own kids were hauled off and killed for being practicing Christians. Yet on June 11, 2008, he will stand up on our behalf and try to apologize to other nations for having exterminated their children.

The whole effort seems more than ludicrous, or obscene. One cannot, after all, apologize to the dead. But the truth is, the government's planned "apology" to native people is an enormous exercise in deception - primarily self-deception.

Do we even know the meaning of that easily uttered term, "apologize"?

It actually has a double meaning, according to the internet Dictionary: a) "an acknowledgment of regret for a fault or offense" and b) "a formal justification, defense or excuse for one's actions".

That is, in our vernacular understanding of the term, an "apology" can be a genuine regret for one's acts; but it can equally be a way to evade responsibility for one's acts, by justifying oneself before one's victim.

The legal understanding of the word, however, is more specific, and has nothing to do with regret: "apology" is defined simply as "a disclaimer of intentional error or offense".

A disclaimer.

Now, I'm assuming that the government of Canada relies on legal definitions - operating, as it claims, "under the rule of law" - rather than popularly understood ones. So we must realize that when the government and its Prime Minister uses the term "apology", its understanding of the word is the legal one: namely, "a disclaimer of intentional error or offense".

In other words, on June 11, Stephen Harper will issue to the world a disclaimer to the effect that the Indian Residential Schools were not an intentional offense.

It's not surprising that the Prime Minister will be making such an outrageous and unsupportable claim, since if he ever admitted that the residential schools were intentional, he'd be the first defendant in the dock at an international war crimes trial.

But more important, this effort by our government - and the churches it is protecting - to be absolved of their own crimes is taking place under the illusory pretense of making amends with native people, when its purpose is simply to legally exonerate itself of culpability for the deaths of thousands of children.

This, indeed, has been the norm for both church and state ever since the first lawsuit was launched by residential school survivors in February of 1996. An army of court scholars and legal experts has generated a mountain of "holocaust denial" at every level of Canadian society during the past dozen years, to convince the world that the daily death and torture at the residential schools was not intentional at all.

Such an "apologetic" agenda defies logic and common sense, as in the statements from the government's misnamed "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" scholars that, while evidence shows that residential school children were being buried "four or five to a grave", and that the death rate in these schools stayed constant at fifty percent for over forty years, these deaths were "not intended".

To believe that, one has to ignore the evidence of senior government officials like Dr. Peter Bryce, who found that children were regularly being "deliberately exposed to communicable diseases" in residential schools, and left to die untreated. The word Bryce used was "deliberately". How else, after all, do so many children die?

All of this legal hoop jumping and evasion of responsibility might make sense to the government, and pay the salaries of their intellectual mercenaries, but it does nothing to advance the cause of truth telling and humanity in Canada, and snuffs out the lives of our victims ever more quickly.

I know this all too well, having spent most of my waking hours for years as a counsellor, advocate and chronicler for many aboriginal survivors of the death camps we like to call residential schools. And what I've learned from such work is that we cannot come to grips with something that we don't understand.

The truth is, Euro-Canadian society still doesn't understand what these "schools" were, either at a "head" or a "heart" level. If one believes the officers of the churches and government, the residential schools "issue" is all about money and verbal gymnastics. Yet none of these officials, as far as I know, have broken down and wept in public over the deaths of so many innocent ones; nor have they even offered to return their remains to their families for a proper burial.

Oddly enough, the very same officials continually and glibly speak about "healing the past", without even knowing their own history, and about "solutions" to the "residential school problem", as if they understand what that problem is - not realizing that, to quote William Shakespeare, "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves."

For in truth, there is not now, nor has there ever been, an "Indian problem" in Canada. Rather, the problem is a "white" one. The problem is with us.

I won't point to collapsing eco-systems or troops in Afghanistan to prove this point. Nor need I pose the paradox of how educated men and women, with families of their own and a professed "Christian morality", could drive needles through infants' tongues at Indian residential schools, throw three year olds down stairs, sterilize healthy kids, and deliberately allow children to cough their lives away from tuberculosis, and then bury them in secret graves.

The evidence of the problem is more immediate, and far closer to home, in our continued segregation of aboriginal people into a lower standard of humanity that allows them to die at a rate fifteen times greater than other people of this country.

After all, if we Canadians are who we imagine ourselves to be - an enlightened society that "assimilated" native people into our ranks, and made them our equals - then why has not a single person ever been brought to trial for the death of a residential school child? Why is the disappearance of tens of thousands of native children in these schools not the subject of a major criminal investigation? And why is there an Indian Act, and not an Irish or an Italian Act?

Being, in reality, an unofficially apartheid society that operates, in practice, with two standards of justice - one for native people, and one for the rest of us - Canada can no more cure the legacy of the residential schools than it can stop chewing up the earth for short-term comfort and profit. At least, not this side of a fundamental moral and social revolution.

The fact that we are far from such a change struck home to me a few months ago when the the government's fraudulent "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" announced that, although criminal acts did indeed occur in the residential schools, there would be no criminal investigation of these schools: an unbelievably brazen subversion of justice that evoked not a murmur of protest in the media or among the good citizens and politicians of Canada.

Regardless of this, there are things that can be done to overcome the genocidal residential schools legacy, and do justice, for once, to the survivors.

Rather than issuing verbal and self-serving "apologies" which change nothing, or staging a sham "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" that has no power even to subpoena evidence, the government and all of us could take these kind of bold measures:

1. Declare an Official Nation-wide Day of Mourning for Residential School Victims, dead and living.

2. Fully disclose what happened in the residential schools - naming the crimes, the perpetrators, and the cover-up - by launching an International War Crimes Tribunal with the power to subpoena, arrest and prosecute those responsible.

3. Bring home the remains of all children who died in these schools for a proper burial, and establish public memorial sites for them.

4. Create National Aboriginal Holocaust Museums.

5. End federal tax exemption for the Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, in accordance with the Nuremburg Legal Principles concerning organizations complicit in crimes against humanity.

6. Abolish the Indian Act and Indian and Northern Affairs.

7. Recognize indigenous sovereignty and return all stolen lands and resources to indigenous nations.

An Irish relative once told me that the way her country is evolving away from eight centuries of warfare is through a simple formula:

"First you remember; then you grieve; then you heal".

Instead of skipping the first two steps, as Mr. Harper and too many of our people are trying to do "apologetically", it is time that Canadians found the courage to truly remember and admit to the world what we did to the first peoples of this land, and grieve our actions in the manner of people who truly rend their own hearts and want to change.

Perhaps then "healing and reconciliation" can become something more than an overworked political catch-phrase.

Rev. Kevin D. Annett
260 Kennedy St.
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2H8
250-753-3345

email: hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca
website: www.hiddenfromhistory.org

Kevin Annett is a community minister in Vancouver who is the author of two books on Indian Residential Schools and an award-winning film maker.

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Rule of Law....

Mr. Toby Barrett bares his true self, with all the wild rants he has been making in the Ontario Legislature of late. I forward a copy of UN 1021 that Canada signed in 1948. We see that article 2 ( c ) “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part” and we see in article 4 “Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.”

Mr. Barrett’s history on this topic is on the public record. He is definitely guilty of complicity in genocide and would be found guilty in any international tribunal. Let the rule of law apply to Toby Barrett and his boss John Tory. When they are clearly breaking one of the most important laws in international history with apparent immunity. Where do they get their bravado? Are they getting prepped at their lodge meetings, by their “judge” and prosecutor brothers?

Have you disclosed your Masonic ties to your constituents yet, gentlemen? I am sure that they would probably agree with John F. Kennedy ‘s take on secret societies, in his speech to the press in 1961.

Let the rule of law apply on the two of you and any of your colleagues in the legislature that promote the continued genocide of another nation. Obviously you better all read the convention;

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment
of the Crime of Genocide

Adopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948.

Article 1

The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article 3

The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article 4

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.



Article 5

The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3.



With unity of mind through the natural law, comes great strength.
Peace,
thahoketoteh of kanekota

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Economy


In 1609, Samuel de Champlain was lead to the Mohawk village of Ticonderoga by his new allies the Wendat (Huron). He provoked a state of war that lasted until “The Great Peace of Montreal” in 1701. Because the Huron had lead him to our village, they were guilty of breaking the Peace and the Iroquois nation engaged in total war with them.

The royal courts of Europe all trace their bloodline to Queen Samirimis (Statue of Liberty) and King Nimrod of Babylon. Their method of mind control (government) was to get people to fight with each other while they sit atop the hierarchal pyramid, like an all seeing eye. No wonder Europe has never known peace as these “cousins” had them continually killing each other. When King Louis declared war on us he boasted he “would wipe the Iroquois from the face of the earth”. We are still here.

When we invited Britain to share Ontario with us through the principles of “Gushwenta” (two row), I am sure there was a celebratory dinner between these cousins. It is still the same today with these families. Now they are the monarchs through the financial systems, running the markets worldwide. The economy was the preferred method they adopted to deal with us after the Great Peace in 1701. Now the unsustainable economy is imploding in it’s death throes. These families (Illuminati) also control every country’s central bank. It is money that drives the markets and they control all the money, so they also control corporations globally through their “self-designed” system of control.

The old Babylonian tactic of “problem, reaction, solution” is in play right now in the economic structure. First you create a problem that will get a reaction from the people. Then you offer a solution to the problem that you created, when the people demand it. The economic solutions they offer will all ensure that their ancient goal of world domination will be met. The deliberate downfall of the US dollar is for their introduction of the Amero, their solution to the problem. We hear top illuminist Al Gore, preaching about the need to get a global government to tackle the carbon problem. When the scientists agree that none of the ‘inconvenient truth” portrayals are good science.

People, we have to find a new way based on egalitarian principles. Every one has the right to freedom of thought. Let us think together for the coming of true peace between each other and the environment. On this planet we all have the same mother, she is the earth.

With unity of mind through the natural law comes great strength.
Peace,
thahoketoteh of kanekota
www.thahoketoteh.ws